Why We Homeschool….or tactics to escape some New World Order.
Aug 3rd, 2006 | By Gidget | Category: HomeschoolThere are all kinds of reasons parents choose to homeschool their child. Our #1 reason was to fulfill our role of advocating for our child. In everything we do for our children, we try to remember to always be our child’s advocate. Many times we fail, but often we get it right.
That sense of ‘getting it right’ came across me tonight after a day of lesson planning in preparation for this year’s curriculum. I feel sickened by the heinously abusive ideology being expressed in our school systems! Maybe the idea of a ‘new-world order’ was not so far fetched. This generation is lining it up quite nicely. At what point are people going to sit up and take notice and speak out against some very horrible abusive practices? Neglecting our children is one of the worst crimes we, as parents and a society as a whole, can commit!
What got me rowled up???
In looking for the six traits criteria-based assessment strategies, I ran across a PDF file describing the use of rubrics. Rubrics are basically an assessment tool. You’ve probably heard the reformist’s cry against the nerve of some teachers to use the dreaded “A-F” grading system and that abhorent “red” pen? Personally, I was on the bench about it. Slobo and I were having a heated discussion about the ‘grading’ issues when I decided to look up some information. He was the one against the reformist’s outcry of A-F and it’s stigmatization of children, I was against the “red pen” until I looked further into it. There is always another path taken than the reformist’s original arguments, isn’t there? Yes, they went down a harmful path under the guise of another. Following are some excerpts from this sickening ideology:
Choosing neutral words for each rating avoids the implication of good/bad
inherent in a generalized A-F or numerical grade. In addition, the natural
temptation of instructors — as well as students — to award a middle ranking is
avoided by the use of an even number of rankings. For example, in a 1-5
ranking system, 3 tends to be used as a “neutral†grade.
These are suggested alternative assessment terms:
Attempted Acceptable Admirable Awesome
Larvae Pupa Cocoon Butterfly
Peasant Artisan Noble Pharaoh
Page Squire Knight Lord
Sour Milk Milk Half and Half Cream
Jeans Sport Jacket Suit Black Tie
Amateur College Athlete Semi-Professional Professional
Byte Kilobyte Megabyte Gigabyte
Private Sergeant Lieutenant Captain
Pepper Cinnamon Nutmeg Saffron
Ground Round London Broil Sirloin Filet Mignon
Bob Cat Panther Tiger Lion
Minnow Flounder Tuna Shark
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT: RUBRICS
Weed Daisy Rose Orchid
First Base Second Base Third Base Home Run
Garden Rattle Cobra Python
The State of Kentucky, which uses a rubric system of assessment, utilizes
four non-pejorative ratings in its rubrics. In ascending order of competence, they are:Novice Apprentice Proficient Distinguished
or
Novice Apprentice Veteran Master
So, tell me, would you want to be called sour milk instead of getting the “F”? Or half-and-half when you tried to be cream? How would you feel knowing that others in your class were Filet Mignon while you were Ground Round? Or you were a peasant and the pharoah sat in front of you? How would you feel knowing the teacher wrote things like that about you and not just in her little black assessment book, but as one teacher, on a laminated assessment chart on the wall of the classroom for all to see?
This brings me back to my own family member who told his kids, look guys, you probably won’t be able to cut it in college, so I’m not even going to consider sending you. Your options are trade-school or the armed services. Is this what we are coming to? Do we have a predetermined notion of that ideal Arian race and I just didn’t get the docs???
Maybe Robert Reich was right. The chasm between the classes has grown so far apart that it cannot recover it’s middle class and maybe it’s not just that wealthiest segment that is creating the chasm. The middle and lower middle classes seem to be doing a pretty good job of creating it on thier own! Dear God, Pray for us sinners now at the hour of our complacency!
Interesting footnote: I went back to see what this smallschoolproject url was. Interestingly enough it’s part of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to allow greater access (uh-huh) to college. For whose little gigabytes?
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation supports a variety of efforts in Washington State to improve schools and help more students attend college. Through the combination of school and district grants, scholarships, and technology enriched classrooms, the Foundation is working to eliminate inequalities in preparation for and access to college for all Washington State students.
Washington State grantees are invited to quarterly cohort meetings that are hosted by the Foundation and planned by the Small Schools Project. Each meeting focuses on a different teaching and learning theme and the materials and resources generated from these meetings are available to download…
And yes, the term ‘cohort meetings’ is their own verbage…. not mine. At least they learned to use their vocabulary correctly.




Hello,
I’m a school administrator in California for a Gates’ initiative school and have attended many national cohort meetings for our particular granting cycle for the “early college” small school model.
My school teaches and learns from approximately 95% first generation college-going students, most are first generation American, and more than 80% are college enrolled and have completed at least one community college class before 12th grade graduation–all paid for by the initiative.
I wanted to provide an example to you of a free and public Gates’ supported small school that is working to close the gap by giving the “less advantaged” child the opportunity to see that college is not only accessible, but entirely possible.
By the way, our school is first come, first served and does is not a “magnet” in any way. We work our butts off, but it’s worth it.
P.S.– at this point, I plan to homeschool my children as well.
I admit that I need to learn a great deal more about the motives and ideology of the Gate’s initiative schools. This is the first time I have read something of it.
Maybe in the meantime, you could help me to understand the alternative assessment terminology. What is that accomplishing? I am asking this as an attempt to understand, not as a criticism.
The “gap” that concerns me is one of “attitude” and not “economic” or “intellectual” per say. As a homeschooler, I hope that you will realize the difference. Children need certain parameters and tools yes, but homeschoolers seem to learn to become hunter/gatherers rather quickly. They are inspirational in the amount of information they assimilate rather quickly. I believe it’s mainly due to the attitude of the homeschooling parent. Parents are learning “how” to teach while the children are learning “how” to become students. The mutual learning makes an inspirational environment of discovery. One that many of us did not learn until college level, where we basically learned how to learn.
p.s. The issue for me, I guess, is one of the acceptance and use of constructive criticism. That’s something I am going to look into more. Thank you for your comment post. I appreciate it very much!
I really respect homeschoolers, and honestly anyone who really looks at what their child needs and works to meed those needs. Kudos to you!